Why Larceny vs.Theft Is No Friend To Privacy Laws?

Privacy is a concern to every individual. No person encourages them to be spied on while living everyday life. But such is not the case. The law has the right to issue electronic surveillance warrants against you if there is a considerable amount of evidence indicating that surveillance will help retain the claim. Wiretap warrant requirements depend on the case to case. The necessary use of such management is limited to serious crimes. To understand why Electronic Surveillance can use it in more minor offenses, one needs to understand the difference between larceny vs. theft.

Understanding the difference  Larceny vs. Theft


Theft involves taking a person’s property without the owner’s permission and with an intent to deprive the owner of their property. Theft is further classified into petty theft, theft, and grand theft. However, theft, in general, is the most common form of theft. Shoplifting is a common form of theft. For a crime to be classified as theft,  the inspection authority should prove the below points:

  • Stealing a property belonging to others.

 It would not count as a crime to take a property that belongs to you from a person who has borrowed or rented it from you.

  • Stealing against the knowledge of the person

A crime cannot be termed as theft if the property is taken from the owner with his knowledge. The owner of the property must be unaware of the act of theft until the property goes missing.

  • Intention to deprive

The theft is finally termed as a crime when there is a purpose or an intention to deprive the owner of using the property again.

Grand theft is when the stolen property has a value of more than $500. 


Larceny is similar to theft; It comes under the umbrella of the crimes involved under theft. Petty or simple larceny is a misdemeanor. On the other hand, grand larceny involves a more considerable amount of property.

Below are some examples of larceny:

Petit Larceny

Larceny that involves the theft of low-value money or good

Grand Larceny

Grand larceny is treated as a felony and is punishable by 20 years. It includes theft of high-value items, including firearms.

Larceny in Finance

The penalty of larceny on financial instruments should be $200 or more to be considered grand larceny, whereas theft below $200 is considered petit larceny. A larceny-theft can be theft of banknotes, checks, petty cash, books of accounts, and goods due for delivery.

How does Wiretap warrant help in Larceny vs. Theft?

Wiretap is one of the most sensitive techniques to gather evidence. The laws strictly control it. It is used mainly for serious crimes or minor crimes that prove a link to a much larger crime scale. There should be probable cause to wiretap, and there should be impartial parties included approving electronic surveillance methods of investigation. Such investigations are constantly under scrutiny as even a slight misuse of the warrant may land the government authorities in troubled waters.

To arrange for wiretap surveillance required the police and the federal government officers to provide enough proof that the crime has reached an extent where wiretapping can mean gathering crucial evidence to capture the culprit. However, before getting an approved warrant for wiretapping, the police need to submit a few wiretap warrant requirements.

  • Evidence of a felony or theft
  • A violation of law by serious crime as murder, theft, kidnapping, robbery, or extortion
  • Unlawful conduct with children 
  • The scandal of visas and other permits
  • Fraud related to various industries not limited to banks and manufacturing

When a theft has occurred, and there is enough evidence to suggest that a particular party has done the crime, there can be a warrant issued by the attorney general. Deputy General, Associate Attorney General, acting or deputy attorney general may authorize an application to a federal judge of the competent jurisdiction wiretap warrant.


In Larceny vs.Theft, there is a slight difference in the crimes. In some of the states, they get treated the same. There are wiretap warrant requirements that the federal department has to follow when it comes to gaining electronic surveillance. The debate whether nonconsensual wiretapping is allowed, it is crucial to understand the nature of the crime and the required evidence through wiretapping can be obtained.

1 thought on “Why Larceny vs.Theft Is No Friend To Privacy Laws?”

Leave a Comment